Imposing practical constraints on costs and timeline is necessary to create realistic project budgets. Failing to do so results in projects being completed at exorbitant expense, or prematurely terminated for lack of funds.

Imposing practical constraints on costs and timeline is necessary to create realistic project budgets. Failing to do so results in projects being completed at exorbitant expense, or prematurely terminated for lack of funds.

Imposing practical constraints on costs and timeline is necessary to create realistic project budgets. Failing to do so results in projects being completed at exorbitant expense, or prematurely terminated for lack of funds.

Both Flutter and React Native support Hot Reload. Сomponents reuse and pre-built components are available in both cases as well.

I think that Flutter's main plus is kind of some strictness. When you write code with Flutter, there is no need for any crutch or duct tape. It pulls you towards the beautiful architecture of the application on its own (a special feature of Google frameworks).

Flutter offers solutions to many problems.
As a result, you'll get beautiful optimized code.

At the same time, React Native is freedom of thought. You can do a lot of great things, you are free to choose the architecture you want. This could lead to serious architectural errors for beginners, but for experienced developers, on the contrary, it will be a powerful
problem-solving tool.

Another big plus of React Native — in most cases mobile apps are compatible with the web and vice versa. Building business logic in JS (regardless of the framework) you can completely move it from the web application to the mobile one (and vice versa).